Setting your location helps us to show you nearby providers and locations based on your healthcare needs.
Your Location is set to Change My Location
Cone Health wants to help you get well and stay well. This section provides tools and information to achieve good health and maintain your well-being.
Learn what community resources are available to help you get well and stay well.
View health and wellness news you can use from Cone Health providers on
View Advanced Search OptionsView All Doctors
View All Locations
Home > Patient & Family Resources > Health Library > Endometrial Cancer Treatment (PDQ®): Treatment - Health Professional Information [NCI]
COVID-19 Info: Vaccines (5 & up) | Boosters | Testing | Visitor Guidelines | Stats | More
IMPORTANT NOTICE: COVID-19 testing appointments are not available at Cone Health emergency departments or urgent care locations. Click here for testing options.
This information is produced and provided by the National Cancer Institute (NCI). The information in this topic may have changed since it was written. For the most current information, contact the National Cancer Institute via the Internet web site at http://cancer.gov or call 1-800-4-CANCER.
Cancer of the endometrium is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States and accounts for 7% of all cancers in women. The majority of cases are diagnosed at an early stage and are amenable to treatment with surgery alone. However, patients with pathologic features predictive of a high rate of relapse and patients with extrauterine spread at diagnosis have a high rate of relapse despite adjuvant therapy.
Incidence and Mortality
Estimated new cases and deaths from cancer of the uterine corpus, which includes the endometrium, in the United States in 2021:
Endometrial cancer is usually diagnosed and treated at an early stage. Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death in patients with endometrial cancer because of the related metabolic risk factors.
The endometrium is the inner lining of the uterus and has both functional and basal layers. The functional layer is hormonally sensitive and is shed in a cyclical pattern during menstruation in reproductive-age women. Both estrogen and progesterone are necessary to maintain a normal endometrial lining. However, factors that lead to an excess of estrogen, including obesity and anovulation, lead to an increase in the deposition of the endometrial lining. These changes may lead to endometrial hyperplasia, and, in some cases, endometrial cancer. Whatever the cause, a thickened lining will lead to sloughing of the endometrial tissue through the endometrial canal and into the vagina. As a result, heavy menstrual bleeding or bleeding after menopause are often the initial signs of endometrial cancer. This symptom tends to happen early in the disease course, allowing for identification of the disease at an early stage for most women.
Anatomy of the female reproductive system.
Increasing age is the most important risk factor for most cancers. Other risk factors for endometrial cancer include the following:
Refer to the PDQ summary on Endometrial Cancer Prevention for more information.
Prolonged, unopposed estrogen exposure has been associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer.[9,32] However, combined estrogen and progesterone therapy prevents the increase in risk of endometrial cancer associated with unopposed estrogen use.[33,34]
Tamoxifen, which is used for both the treatment and prevention of breast cancer (NSABP-B-14), is associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer related to the estrogenic effect of tamoxifen on the endometrium.[15,35] It is important that patients who are receiving tamoxifen and experiencing abnormal uterine bleeding have follow-up examinations and biopsy of the endometrial lining. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration released a black box warning that includes data about the increase in uterine malignancies associated with tamoxifen use. (Refer to the Lynch syndrome section in the PDQ summary on Genetics of Breast and Gynecologic Cancers for more information about risk factors for Lynch syndrome–associated endometrial cancer.)
Irregular vaginal bleeding is the most common presenting sign of endometrial cancer. It generally occurs early in the disease process, and is the reason why most patients are diagnosed with highly curable stage I endometrial cancer.
The following procedures may be used to detect endometrial cancer:
To definitively diagnose endometrial cancer, a procedure that directly samples the endometrial tissue is necessary.
The Pap smear is not a reliable screening procedure for the detection of endometrial cancer, even though a retrospective study found a strong correlation between positive cervical cytology and high-risk endometrial disease (i.e., high-grade tumor and deep myometrial invasion). A prospective study found a statistically significant association between malignant cytology and increased risk of nodal disease.
Prognostic factors for endometrial cancer include the following:
Tumor stage and grade (including extrauterine nodal spread)
The following table highlights the risk of nodal metastasis based on findings at the time of staging surgery:
A Gynecologic Oncology Group study related surgical-pathologic parameters and postoperative treatment to recurrence-free interval and recurrence site. Grade 3 histology and deep myometrial invasion in patients without extrauterine spread were the greatest determinants of recurrence. In this study, the frequency of recurrence was greatly increased with the following:[39,40]
When the only evidence of extrauterine spread is positive peritoneal cytology, the influence on outcome is unclear. The value of therapy directed at this cytologic finding is not well founded,[41,42,43,44,45,46] and some data are contradictory. Although the collection of cytology specimens is still suggested, a positive result does not upstage the cancer. Other extrauterine disease must be present before additional postoperative therapy is considered.
Involvement of the capillary-lymphatic space on histopathologic examination correlates with extrauterine and nodal spread of tumor.
Hormone receptor status
Progesterone and estrogen receptors, assessed either by biochemical or immunohistochemical methods, are included, when possible, in the evaluation of patients with stage I and stage II cancer.[49,50,51]
One report found progesterone receptor levels to be the single most important prognostic indicator of 3-year survival in clinical stages I and II disease. Patients with progesterone receptor levels of 100 or greater had a 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate of 93%, compared with 36% for those with a level below 100. After adjusting for progesterone receptor levels, only cervical involvement and peritoneal cytology were significant prognostic variables.
Other reports confirm the importance of hormone receptor status as an independent prognostic factor. Additionally, immunohistochemical staining of paraffin-embedded tissue for both estrogen and progesterone receptors has been shown to correlate with Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique (FIGO) grade and survival.[49,50,51]
Other prognostic factors
Other factors predictive of poor prognosis include the following:[51,54,55]
A general review of prognostic factors has been published.
Other PDQ summaries containing information related to endometrial (uterine corpus) cancer include the following:
Endometrial cancers are classified as one of the following two types:
The most common type of endometrial cancer is endometrioid adenocarcinoma.
Frequency of endometrial cancer cell types is as follows:
PTEN mutations are more common in type 1 endometrial cancers; p53 and Her-2/neu overexpression are more common in type 2 endometrial cancers, although some overlap exists.
The Cancer Genome Atlas's full genetic display of hundreds of endometrial cancers identified four subtypes to further characterize endometrial cancers:
These categories can be used to stratify patients into low- and high-risk prognostic categories. A modification of The Cancer Genome Atlas methods into more accessible tests was also successful in discriminating cancers into relevant prognostic categories. However, a combination of previously known risk factors with the genetic data was the most effective at determining prognostic categories.
The pattern of endometrial cancer spread is partially dependent on the degree of cellular differentiation. Well-differentiated tumors tend to limit their spread to the surface of the endometrium; myometrial invasion is less common. Myometrial invasion occurs much more frequently in patients with poorly differentiated tumors and is frequently a harbinger of lymph node involvement and distant metastases.[1,2]
Metastatic spread occurs in a characteristic pattern. Regional spread to the pelvic and periaortic nodes is common. Distant metastasis most commonly involves the following sites:
The Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique (FIGO) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) have both designated staging systems for endometrial cancer. The FIGO system is the most commonly used staging system for endometrial cancer.[3,4]
FIGO stages I to IV are further subdivided by the histologic grade (G) of the tumor, for example, stage IB G2. Carcinosarcomas, which had previously been designated as sarcomas, are now considered poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas; as such, they are included in this system.
The degree of tumor differentiation has an important effect on the natural history of this disease and on treatment selection.
Patients with endometrial cancer who have localized disease are usually cured. Best results are obtained with one of two standard treatments:
Patients with regional and distant metastases are rarely cured, although they are occasionally responsive to standard hormone therapy.
Progestational agents have been evaluated as adjuvant therapy in several randomized trials; a meta-analysis by the Cochrane group confirms no clinical benefit to adjuvant progestogens in clinical stage I disease.[Level of evidence: 1iiA]
The treatment options for each stage of endometrial cancer are presented in Table 6.
Standard Treatment Options for Stage I and Stage II Endometrial Cancer
Treatment of stage I and stage II endometrial cancer depends on the grade and histologic type.
In the current Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique (FIGO) staging system, stage II describes tumor that invades the cervical stroma; this is equivalent to the prior stage IIB. Almost all randomized trials for early-stage cancer excluded stage IIB patients. As a result, there is a paucity of quality data on which to base clinical decisions for stage II patients.
Grades 1 and 2 tumors are considered low-risk unless they are serous or clear cell subtype.
Standard treatment for patients with low-risk histologic subtypes of stage I endometrial cancer include the following:
Most patients do well with surgery alone. A subset of patients with stage I disease is at a high risk of recurrence and is eligible for adjuvant therapy.
Grade 3 tumors of any histology and any serous tumors, clear cell tumors, or carcinosarcomas are considered high-risk.
Treatment options for patients with stage I or stage II endometrial cancer with high-risk histology include the following:
Patients with serous or clear cell histologies have higher rates of recurrence than do patients with other stage I or stage II endometrioid carcinomas. The outcomes in institutional case series that utilize a regimen of adjuvant carboplatin plus paclitaxel, occasionally including radiation therapy for this histologic subtype, have been published and form the basis of management guidelines.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
Carcinosarcomas have been evaluated in clinical trials both separately and with other sarcomas because of their prior designation in this group. In a nonrandomized Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) study of patients with stage I or II carcinosarcomas, patients who underwent pelvic radiation therapy had a significant reduction in recurrences within the radiation treatment field but no improvement in survival. One nonrandomized study that predominantly included patients with carcinosarcomas appeared to show benefit for adjuvant therapy with cisplatin and doxorubicin.
If the uterine cervix is involved, options include one or more of the following:
Single-institution reviews suggest that radical hysterectomy is more beneficial than standard hysterectomy in cases of cervical involvement of the tumor.[12,13,14]
Surgery with or without lymph node sampling
The following table highlights the risk of nodal metastasis based on findings at the time of staging surgery:
For patients in Group A, lymph node dissection has limited utility. Conversely, full pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection is important for patients in Group C, given the likelihood of positive findings. The difficulty lies in determining how to manage patients in Group B.
There are several accepted surgical approaches for patients with presumed stage I endometrial cancer, with intermediate risk for lymphatic spread.
Both retrospective and prospective data supports stratifying patients with presumed stage I endometrial cancer into two groups based on the following characteristics:
Evidence (lymph node dissection):
Evidence (treatment or surgical staging using laparoscopy vs. laparotomy):
Time to recurrence was the primary endpoint, with noninferiority defined as a difference in recurrence rate of less than 5.3% between the two groups at 3 years.
Future analyses may determine whether there are subgroups of patients for whom there is a clinically significant decrement when laparoscopic staging is utilized.[Level of evidence: 1iiDiii]
Postoperative vaginal brachytherapy
While adjuvant radiation therapy will reduce the incidence of local and regional recurrence, improved survival has not been proven, and toxic effects are worse with radiation therapy.[24,25,26,27,28] Vaginal cuff brachytherapy is associated with less radiation-related morbidity than is external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and has been shown to be equivalent to EBRT in the short term for patients with stage I disease. However, long-term follow up of a randomized trial comparing EBRT plus vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) to VBT alone found decreased OS and increased toxicity in the EBRT plus VBT arm.
Postoperative radiation therapy
If the cervix is clinically uninvolved, but extension to the cervix is noted on postoperative pathology, radiation therapy is considered.[Level of evidence: 1iiA]
Radiation therapy alone
Patients who have medical contraindications to surgery may be treated with radiation therapy alone, but cure rates may be lower than those attained with surgery.[35,36,37]
Treatment Options Under Clinical Evaluation for Stage I and Stage II Endometrial Cancer
Current Clinical Trials
Use our advanced clinical trial search to find NCI-supported cancer clinical trials that are now enrolling patients. The search can be narrowed by location of the trial, type of treatment, name of the drug, and other criteria. General information about clinical trials is also available.
Standard Treatment Options for Stage III, Stage IV, and Recurrent Endometrial Cancer
Standard treatment options for stage III, stage IV, and recurrent endometrial cancer include the following:
Treatment of patients with stage IV endometrial cancer is dictated by the site of metastatic disease and symptoms related to disease sites.
Surgery followed by chemotherapy or radiation therapy
In general, patients with stage III or stage IV endometrial cancer are treated with surgery, followed by chemotherapy or radiation therapy, or both. Observational studies support maximal cytoreductive surgery for patients with stage IV disease, although these conclusions need to be interpreted with care because of the small number of cases and likely selection bias.[1,2]
For many years, radiation therapy was the standard adjuvant treatment for patients with endometrial cancer. However, several randomized trials have confirmed improved survival when adjuvant chemotherapy is used instead of radiation therapy.
Doxorubicin was historically the most active anticancer agent employed, with useful but temporary responses obtained in as many as 33% of patients with recurrent disease. Paclitaxel, in combination with platinum chemotherapy or as a single agent, also has significant anticancer activity.
Evidence (surgery followed by chemotherapy or radiation therapy):
Given the toxicity and limited efficacy of these regimens, other treatment options have been widely sought. Several observational studies [7,8] and phase II studies [9,10,11,12] suggest clinical activity with the combination of platinum chemotherapy and paclitaxel in patients with endometrial cancer and measurable disease either after primary surgery or at recurrence.
Chemotherapy and radiation therapy
Patients with inoperable disease caused by tumor that extends to the pelvic wall may be treated with a combination of chemotherapy and radiation therapy. The usual approach for radiation therapy is to use a combination of intracavitary and external-beam radiation therapy.[18,19]
For patients with localized recurrences (pelvic and paraaortic lymph nodes) or distant metastases in selected sites, radiation therapy may be an effective palliative therapy. Pelvic radiation therapy may be curative in pure vaginal recurrence when no previous radiation therapy has been used.
Progesterone and estrogen hormone receptors are commonly found in endometrial carcinoma tissues. Response to hormone therapy is correlated with the presence and level of hormone receptors and the degree of tumor differentiation. Patients with tumors that are positive for estrogen and progesterone receptors respond best to progestin therapy.
When distant metastases, especially pulmonary metastases, are present, hormonal therapy is indicated. Patients who are not candidates for either surgery or radiation therapy may be treated with progestational agents, the most common hormonal treatment. Progestational agents produce good antitumor responses in 15% to 30% of patients. These responses are associated with significant improvement in survival.
Standard progestational agents include the following:
Evidence (progestin therapy):
A receptor-poor status may predict a poor response to progestins and a better response to cytotoxic chemotherapy.
Other hormonal agents have shown benefit in treating endometrial cancer. Tamoxifen (20 mg bid) yields a response rate of 20% in patients who do not respond to standard progesterone therapy.
Aromatase inhibitors have also been evaluated for the treatment of advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer, although they yield lower response rates than progestational agents.
Several biologic agents have been evaluated for the treatment of endometrial cancer.
Endometrial cancers often show alterations in the AKT-PI3K pathway, making mTOR inhibitors an attractive choice for clinical study in patients with metastatic or recurrent disease. Phase II studies of single-agent everolimus  and ridaforolimus [26,27] have predominantly shown disease stabilization. A phase II study of the combination of everolimus and letrozole showed a response rate of 32%.[Level of evidence: 3iiiDiv]
Treatment Options Under Clinical Evaluation for Stage III, Stage IV, and Recurrent Endometrial Cancer
All patients with advanced disease should be considered for clinical trials that evaluate single-agent or combination therapy for this disease.
Studies of treatment failure patterns have found a high rate of distant metastases in the upper abdomen and in extra-abdominal sites. For this reason, patients with stage III disease may be candidates for innovative clinical trials.
Treatment options under clinical evaluation for stage IV endometrial cancer include the following agents:
The PDQ cancer information summaries are reviewed regularly and updated as new information becomes available. This section describes the latest changes made to this summary as of the date above.
General Information About Endometrial Cancer
Revised text to state that endometrial cancer accounts for 7% of all cancers in women.
This summary is written and maintained by the PDQ Adult Treatment Editorial Board, which is editorially independent of NCI. The summary reflects an independent review of the literature and does not represent a policy statement of NCI or NIH. More information about summary policies and the role of the PDQ Editorial Boards in maintaining the PDQ summaries can be found on the About This PDQ Summary and PDQ® - NCI's Comprehensive Cancer Database pages.
Purpose of This Summary
This PDQ cancer information summary for health professionals provides comprehensive, peer-reviewed, evidence-based information about the treatment of endometrial cancer. It is intended as a resource to inform and assist clinicians who care for cancer patients. It does not provide formal guidelines or recommendations for making health care decisions.
Reviewers and Updates
This summary is reviewed regularly and updated as necessary by the PDQ Adult Treatment Editorial Board, which is editorially independent of the National Cancer Institute (NCI). The summary reflects an independent review of the literature and does not represent a policy statement of NCI or the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Board members review recently published articles each month to determine whether an article should:
Changes to the summaries are made through a consensus process in which Board members evaluate the strength of the evidence in the published articles and determine how the article should be included in the summary.
The lead reviewers for Endometrial Cancer Treatment are:
Any comments or questions about the summary content should be submitted to Cancer.gov through the NCI website's Email Us. Do not contact the individual Board Members with questions or comments about the summaries. Board members will not respond to individual inquiries.
Levels of Evidence
Some of the reference citations in this summary are accompanied by a level-of-evidence designation. These designations are intended to help readers assess the strength of the evidence supporting the use of specific interventions or approaches. The PDQ Adult Treatment Editorial Board uses a formal evidence ranking system in developing its level-of-evidence designations.
Permission to Use This Summary
PDQ is a registered trademark. Although the content of PDQ documents can be used freely as text, it cannot be identified as an NCI PDQ cancer information summary unless it is presented in its entirety and is regularly updated. However, an author would be permitted to write a sentence such as "NCI's PDQ cancer information summary about breast cancer prevention states the risks succinctly: [include excerpt from the summary]."
The preferred citation for this PDQ summary is:
PDQ® Adult Treatment Editorial Board. PDQ Endometrial Cancer Treatment. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. Updated <MM/DD/YYYY>. Available at: https://www.cancer.gov/types/uterine/hp/endometrial-treatment-pdq. Accessed <MM/DD/YYYY>. [PMID: 26389270]
Images in this summary are used with permission of the author(s), artist, and/or publisher for use within the PDQ summaries only. Permission to use images outside the context of PDQ information must be obtained from the owner(s) and cannot be granted by the National Cancer Institute. Information about using the illustrations in this summary, along with many other cancer-related images, is available in Visuals Online, a collection of over 2,000 scientific images.
Based on the strength of the available evidence, treatment options may be described as either "standard" or "under clinical evaluation." These classifications should not be used as a basis for insurance reimbursement determinations. More information on insurance coverage is available on Cancer.gov on the Managing Cancer Care page.
More information about contacting us or receiving help with the Cancer.gov website can be found on our Contact Us for Help page. Questions can also be submitted to Cancer.gov through the website's Email Us.
Last Revised: 2021-04-09
Healthwise, Healthwise for every health decision, and the Healthwise logo are trademarks of Healthwise, Incorporated.
Subscribe to our Wellness Matters e-newsletter, a monthly snapshot of the some of great wellness content from Cone Health providers.